Click to Print This Page
Code CONF 523
Term 201302
Title Issues, Concepts and Theories in Conflict Resolution
Faculty Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Subject Conf. Analysis Res.(CONF)
SU Credit 3
ECTS Credit 10.00
Instructor(s) Murat Bayar,
Detailed Syllabus
Language of Instruction English
Level of Course Doctoral
Type of Course Click here to view.
(only for SU students)
Mode of Delivery Formal lecture,Interactive lecture,One-to-one tutorial
Planned Learning Activities Interactive,Communicative,Discussion based learning

Considers the key substantive themes in conflict resolution. Senior scholars will present their approaches to each of these themes in two-week modules, including identity conflicts and nationalism, language and culture and institutions, the global context of conflict, and the dynamics of the peace process. Students will be expected to complete a concept essay on each of these thematic modules.


This course provides students with a global understanding of contemporary natural resource rivalries at the international and domestic levels.

Learning Outcome

This course focuses on the role of natural resources in interstate and domestic conflicts.

Programme Outcomes
Common Outcomes For All Programs
1 Develop and deepen the current and advanced knowledge in the field with original thought and/or research and come up with innovative definitions based on Master's degree qualifications 4
2 Conceive the interdisciplinary interaction which the field is related with ; come up with original solutions by using knowledge requiring proficiency on analysis, synthesis and assessment of new and complex ideas. 4
3 Evaluate and use new information within the field in a systematic approach. 4
4 Develop an innovative knowledge, method, design and/or practice or adapt an already known knowledge, method, design and/or practice to another field; research, conceive, design, adapt and implement an original subject. 4
5 Critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation of new and complex ideas. 4
6 Gain advanced level skills in the use of research methods in the field of study. 3
7 Contribute the progression in the field by producing an innovative idea, skill, design and/or practice or by adapting an already known idea, skill, design, and/or practice to a different field independently. 4
8 Broaden the borders of the knowledge in the field by producing or interpreting an original work or publishing at least one scientific paper in the field in national and/or international refereed journals. 4
9 Demonstrate leadership in contexts requiring innovative and interdisciplinary problem solving. 3
10 Develop new ideas and methods in the field by using high level mental processes such as creative and critical thinking, problem solving and decision making. 4
11 Investigate and improve social connections and their conducting norms and manage the actions to change them when necessary. 4
12 Defend original views when exchanging ideas in the field with professionals and communicate effectively by showing competence in the field. 4
13 Ability to communicate and discuss orally, in written and visually with peers by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio C1 General Level. 4
14 Contribute to the transition of the community to an information society and its sustainability process by introducing scientific, technological, social or cultural improvements. 4
15 Demonstrate functional interaction by using strategic decision making processes in solving problems encountered in the field. 4
16 Contribute to the solution finding process regarding social, scientific, cultural and ethical problems in the field and support the development of these values. 4
Common Outcomes For All Programs
1 Develop the ability to use critical, analytical, and reflective thinking and reasoning 4
2 Reflect on social and ethical responsibilities in his/her professional life. 4
3 Gain experience and confidence in the dissemination of project/research outputs 4
4 Work responsibly and creatively as an individual or as a member or leader of a team and in multidisciplinary environments. 4
5 Communicate effectively by oral, written, graphical and technological means and have competency in English. 4
6 Independently reach and acquire information, and develop appreciation of the need for continuously learning and updating. 4
Common Outcomes ForFaculty of Arts & Social Sci.
1 Develop a thorough knowledge of theories, concepts, and research methods in the field and apply them in research design and data analysis. 5
2 Assess the impact of the economic, social, and political environment from a global, national and regional level. 5
3 Know how to access written and visual, primary and secondary sources of information, interpret concepts and data from a variety of sources in developing disciplinary and interdisciplinary analyses. 5
Conflict Analysis and Resolution (with thesis) Program Outcomes Core Electives
1 Analyze current and persistent conflict situations with an emphasis on perceptual and cultural aspects of social conflicts. 5
2 Conduct research in sources of conflicts and possible conflict resolution methods such as negotiation, third-party intervention, cooperative decision making, peace building, track-two and citizens? diplomacy applied to various social contexts. 4
3 Design and implement conflict resolution process to policy issues related to disputes in or among identity groups, governments, organizations, civil society or corporations. 4
4 Develop and sustain arguments in a variety of forms, formulating appropriate questions and utilizing evidence. 4
Assessment Methods and Criteria
  Percentage (%)
Midterm 25
Assignment 10
Term-Paper 25
Participation 15
Presentation 10
Other 15
Recommended or Required Reading

Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243?1248.

Sachs, Jeremy D., and Andrew M. Warner. 2001. The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review 45(4?6): 827?838.

Rosser, A. 2006. The political economy of the resource curse: A literature survey. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. Working Paper 268.

Rudra, Nita, and Nathan M. Jensen. 2011. Globalization and the politics of natural resources. Comparative Political Studies 44(6): 639-661.

Ross, Michael L. 2004. What do we know about natural resources and civil war?? Journal of Peace Research 41(3): 337?356.

Jensen, Nathan, and Leonard Wantchekon. 2004. Resource wealth and political regimes in Africa. Comparative Political Studies 37(7): 816-841.

Omgba, Luc D. 2008. On the duration of political power in Africa: The role of oil rents. Comparative Political Studies 42(3): 416-436.

Bearce, David H. and Jennifer A.L. Hutnick. 2011. Toward an alternative explanation for the resource curse: Natural resources, immigration, and democratization. Comparative Political Studies 44(6): 689-718.

McCaffrey, Stephen C., and Mpazi Sinjela. 1998. The 1997 United Nations convention on international watercourses. The American Journal of International Law 92(1): 97-107.

Dellapenna, Joseph, and Joyeeta Gupta. 2008. Toward global law on water. Global Governance 14(4): 437-453.

Brown, Oli, Anne Hammill, and Robert McLeman. 2007. Climate change as the 'new' security threat: Implications for Africa. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 83(6): 1141-1154.

Hovi, Jon-Skodvin, and Stine Tora-Aakre. 2013. Can climate change negotiation succeed? Politics and Governance 1(2): 138-150.

Homer-Dixon, Thomas F. 1994. Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: Evidence from cases. International Security 19(1): 5-40.

Haftendorn, Helga. 2000. Water and international conflict. Third World Quarterly 21(1): 51-68.

Postel, Sandra L., and Aaron T. Wolf. 2001. Dehydrating conflict. Foreign Policy 126 (Sep.- Oct.): 60-67.

Kibaroglu, Aysegul. 2007. Politics of water resources in the Jordan, Nile and Tigris- Euphrates: Three river basins, three narratives. Perceptions (Spring).

Reguer, Sara. 1993. Controversial waters: Exploitation of the Jordan River, 1950-80. Middle Eastern Studies 29(1): 53-90.

Elmusa, Sharif S. 1996. The land-water nexus in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Palestine Studies 25(3): 69-78.

Ronen, Yehudit. 2003. Sudan and Egypt: The swing of the pendulum (1989-2001). Middle Eastern Studies 39(3): 81-98.

Selby, Jan. 2005. The geopolitics of water in the Middle East: Fantasies and realities. Third World Quarterly 26(2): 329-349.

Humphreys, Macartan. 2005. Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution: Uncovering the mechanisms. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 508-537.

Lujala, Paivil, Nils Petter Gleditsch, and Elisabeth Gilmore. 2005. A diamond curse? Civil war and a lootable resource. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 538-562.

Keen, David. 2005. Liberalization and Conflict. International Political Science Review 26(1): 73-89.

Wennmann, Achim. 2007. The political economy of conflict financing: A Comprehensive approach beyond natural resources. Global Governance 13(3): 427-444.

Thoumi, Francisco E. 2002. Illegal drugs in Colombia: From illegal economic boom to social crisis. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 582: 102-116.

Cornell, Svante E. 2005. The interaction of narcotics and conflict. Journal of Peace Research 42(6): 751-760.

Lujala, Paivi. 2009. Deadly combat over natural resources: Gems, petroleum, drugs, and the severity of armed civil conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 53(1): 50-71.

Buhaug, Halvard, Scott Gates, and Paivi Lujala. 2009. Geography, rebel capability, and the duration of civil conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 53(4): 544-569.

Giordano, Mark F., Meredith A. Giordano, and Aaron T. Wolf. 2005. International Resource Conflict and Mitigation. Journal of Peace Research 42(1): 47-65.

Fearon, James D. 2005. Primary commodity exports and civil war. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 483-507.

Basedau, Matthias, and Jann Lay. 2009. Resource curse or rentier peace? The ambiguous effects of oil wealth and oil dependence onviolent conflict. Journal of Peace Research 46(6): 757-776.

Fjelde, Hanne. 2009. Buying peace? Oil wealth, corruption and civil war, 1985?99. Journal of Peace Research 46(2): 199-218.
April 29 ? Oil and natural gas ? 2

Mehdiyoun, Kamyar. 2000. Ownership of oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea. The American Journal of International Law 94(1): 179-189.

Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2005. Resource rents, governance, and conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 625-633.

Lai, Hongyi Harry. 2007. China's oil diplomacy: Is it a global security threat? Third World Quarterly 28(3): 519-537.

Ross, Michael L. 2008. Oil, Islam, and women. The American Political Science Review 102(1): 107-123.

Olsson, Ola, and Heather Congdon. 2004. Congo: The prize of predation. Journal of Peace Research 41(3): 321-336.

Braithwaite, Alex. 2010. Resisting infection: How state capacity conditions conflict contagion. Journal of Peace Research 47(3): 311-319.

Kapur, S. Paul. 2005. India and Pakistan's unstable peace: Why nuclear South Asia is not like cold war Europe. International Security 30(2): 127-152.

Ladwig III, Walter C. 2007. A cold start for hot wars? The Indian army's new limited war doctrine. International Security 32(3): 158-190.

Barrington, Lowell W., Erik S. Herron, and Brian D. Silver. 2003. The motherland is calling: Views of homeland among Russians in the near abroad. World Politics 55(2): 290-313.

Gel'man, Vladimir. 2008. Out of the frying pan, into the fire? Post-Soviet regime changes in comparative perspective. International Political Science Review 29(2): 157-180.

Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Institutions and cooperation: Sanctions during the Falkland Islands conflict. International Security 16(4): 143-178.

Dodds, Klaus, and Lara Manovil. 2001. Back to the future? Implementing the Anglo-Argentine 14th July 1999 joint statement. Journal of Latin American Studies 33(4): 777-806.