Click to Print This Page
Code CONF 504
Term 201302
Title Foreign Policy and Conflict Resolution
Faculty Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Subject Conf. Analysis Res.(CONF)
SU Credit 3
ECTS Credit 10.00
Instructor(s) Murat Bayar,
Detailed Syllabus
Language of Instruction English
Level of Course Doctoral
Type of Course Click here to view.
(only for SU students)
Mode of Delivery Formal lecture,One-to-one tutorial
Planned Learning Activities Interactive,Communicative,Discussion based learning,Task based learning

The use of conflict resolution approaches in the development and implementation of a nation's foreign policy. Addresses the challenge of how policy making and diplomatic practice can be influenced by theories of conflict resolutions. Students will compare security oriented foreign policy approaches with innovative foreign policy formulations.


This course aims to apply Conflict Resolution theories, approaches, and methods to contemporary foreign policy issues.

Learning Outcome

This course provides students with an up-to-date understanding of some of the most challenging and enduring conflicts/disputes of our time.

Programme Outcomes
Common Outcomes For All Programs
1 Develop and deepen the current and advanced knowledge in the field with original thought and/or research and come up with innovative definitions based on Master's degree qualifications 4
2 Conceive the interdisciplinary interaction which the field is related with ; come up with original solutions by using knowledge requiring proficiency on analysis, synthesis and assessment of new and complex ideas. 4
3 Evaluate and use new information within the field in a systematic approach. 4
4 Develop an innovative knowledge, method, design and/or practice or adapt an already known knowledge, method, design and/or practice to another field; research, conceive, design, adapt and implement an original subject. 4
5 Critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation of new and complex ideas. 5
6 Gain advanced level skills in the use of research methods in the field of study. 3
7 Contribute the progression in the field by producing an innovative idea, skill, design and/or practice or by adapting an already known idea, skill, design, and/or practice to a different field independently. 4
8 Broaden the borders of the knowledge in the field by producing or interpreting an original work or publishing at least one scientific paper in the field in national and/or international refereed journals. 4
9 Demonstrate leadership in contexts requiring innovative and interdisciplinary problem solving. 3
10 Develop new ideas and methods in the field by using high level mental processes such as creative and critical thinking, problem solving and decision making. 4
11 Investigate and improve social connections and their conducting norms and manage the actions to change them when necessary. 5
12 Defend original views when exchanging ideas in the field with professionals and communicate effectively by showing competence in the field. 4
13 Ability to communicate and discuss orally, in written and visually with peers by using a foreign language at least at a level of European Language Portfolio C1 General Level. 4
14 Contribute to the transition of the community to an information society and its sustainability process by introducing scientific, technological, social or cultural improvements. 4
15 Demonstrate functional interaction by using strategic decision making processes in solving problems encountered in the field. 3
16 Contribute to the solution finding process regarding social, scientific, cultural and ethical problems in the field and support the development of these values. 4
Common Outcomes For All Programs
1 Develop the ability to use critical, analytical, and reflective thinking and reasoning 4
2 Reflect on social and ethical responsibilities in his/her professional life. 4
3 Gain experience and confidence in the dissemination of project/research outputs 4
4 Work responsibly and creatively as an individual or as a member or leader of a team and in multidisciplinary environments. 4
5 Communicate effectively by oral, written, graphical and technological means and have competency in English. 4
6 Independently reach and acquire information, and develop appreciation of the need for continuously learning and updating. 4
Common Outcomes ForFaculty of Arts & Social Sci.
1 Develop a thorough knowledge of theories, concepts, and research methods in the field and apply them in research design and data analysis. 5
2 Assess the impact of the economic, social, and political environment from a global, national and regional level. 5
3 Know how to access written and visual, primary and secondary sources of information, interpret concepts and data from a variety of sources in developing disciplinary and interdisciplinary analyses. 5
Political Science (with thesis) Program Outcomes Core Electives
1 Begin to grasp historical evolution and contemporary character of world politics. 5
Conflict Analysis and Resolution (with thesis) Program Outcomes Core Electives
1 Analyze current and persistent conflict situations with an emphasis on perceptual and cultural aspects of social conflicts. 5
2 Conduct research in sources of conflicts and possible conflict resolution methods such as negotiation, third-party intervention, cooperative decision making, peace building, track-two and citizens? diplomacy applied to various social contexts. 4
3 Design and implement conflict resolution process to policy issues related to disputes in or among identity groups, governments, organizations, civil society or corporations. 4
4 Develop and sustain arguments in a variety of forms, formulating appropriate questions and utilizing evidence. 4
Assessment Methods and Criteria
  Percentage (%)
Midterm 20
Term-Paper 25
Participation 15
Individual Project 10
Written Report 10
Presentation 10
Other 10
Recommended or Required Reading

Cirincione, Joseph. 2007. Bomb scare: The history and future of nuclear weapons. New York: Columbia University Press. Chp.s 4 & 8.

Waltz, Kenneth N. 2012. Why Iran should get the bomb: Nuclear balancing would mean stability. Foreign Affairs July/August. Available at:

Kroneig, Matthew. 2012. Time to attack Iran: Why a strike is the least bad option. Foreign Affairs July/August. Available at:

Gibson, Bryan R. 2013. Iran nuclear deal shows hawks that diplomacy actually works. CNN November 25. Available at:

Gleick, Peter H. 1993. Water and Conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security 18(1): 79-112.

Kibaroglu, Aysegul, and Olcay Unver. 2000. An Institutional framework for facilitating cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice 5(2): 311?330.

Carko?lu, Ali, and Mine Eder. 2001. Domestic concerns and the water conflict over the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. Middle Eastern Studies 37(1): 41-71.

Zawahri, Neda A. 2006. Stabilising Iraq's water supply: What the Euphrates and Tigris rivers can learn from the Indus. Third World Quarterly 27(6): 1041-1058.

Athanassopoulou, Ekavi. 1997. ?Blessing in disguise?? The Imia crisis and Turkish-Greek relations. Mediterranean Politics 2(3): 76?101.

Tsakonas, Panayotis, and Antonis Tournikiotis. 2003. Greece's elusive quest for security providers: The `expectations-reality gap.' Security Dialogue 34: 301-314.

Diez, Thomas, Stephan Stetter, and Mathias Albert. 2006. The European Union and border conflicts: The transformative power of integration. International Organization 60(3): 563-593.

Onis, Ziya, and Suhnaz Yilmaz. 2008. Greek-Turkish rapprochement: Rhetoric or reality? Political Science Quarterly 123(1): 123-149.

Falah, Ghazi-Walid. 2005. The Geopolitics of 'enclavisation' and the demise of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Third World Quarterly 26(8): 1341-1372.

Lowrance, Sherry. 2006. Identity, grievances, and political action: Recent evidence from the Palestinian Community in Israel. International Political Science Review 27(2): 167-190.

Rowley, Charles K., and Jennis Taylor. 2006. The Israel and Palestine land settlement problem, 1948-2005: An analytical history. Public Choice 128(1/2): 77-90.

Arnon, Ariel. 2007. Israeli policy towards the occupied Palestinian territories: The economic dimension, 1967-2007. Middle East Journal 61(4): 573-595.

Freedman, Lawrence. 2000. Victims and victors: Reflections on the Kosovo war. Review of International Studies 26(3): 335-358.

Rogel, Carole. 2003. Kosovo: Where it all began. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 17(1): 167-182.

Wilson, Jeremy M. 2006. Law and order in an emerging democracy: Lessons from the Reconstruction of Kosovo's police and justice systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605: 152-177.

Weller, Marc. 2008. Kosovo's final status. International Affairs 84(6): 1223-1243.

Barylski, Robert V. 1995. Russia, the West, and the Caspian energy hub. Middle East Journal 49(2): 217-232.

Mehdiyoun, Kamyar. 2000. Ownership of oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea. The American Journal of International Law 94(1): 179-189.

Askari, Hossein, and Roshanak Taghavi. 2006. Iran's financial stake in Caspian oil. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 33(1): 1-18.

Williams, Paul A., and Ali Tekin. 2008. The Iraq war, Turkey, and renewed Caspian energy prospects. Middle East Journal 62(3): 383-397.

Mirimanova, Natalia. 1997. Democratization and conflicts in Russia and the newly independent states. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 552: 86-97.

Castillo, Jasen. 1997. The dilemma of simultaneity: Russia and Georgia in the midst of transformation. World Affairs 160(1): 34-42.

Radnitz, Scott. 2010. The color of money: Privatization, economic dispersion, and the post-Soviet "revolutions." Comparative Politics 42(2): 127-146.

Allison, Roy. 2008. Russia resurgent? Moscow's campaign to 'coerce Georgia to peace.' International Affairs 84(6): 1145-1171.

Benini, Aldo A., and Lawrence H. Moulton. 2004. Civilian victims in an asymmetrical conflict: Operation enduring freedom, Afghanistan. Journal of Peace Research 41(4): 403-422.

Goldsmith, Benjamin E., Yusaku Horiuchi, and Takashi Inoguchi. 2005. American foreign policy and global opinion: Who supported the war in Afghanistan? The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(3): 408-429.

Riphenburg, Carol J. 2005. Ethnicity and civil society in contemporary Afghanistan. Middle East Journal 59(1): 31-51.

De Nevers, Renee. 2007. NATO's International Security Role in the Terrorist Era. International Security 31(4): 34-66.

Byman, Daniel. 2003. Constructing a democratic Iraq: Challenges and opportunities. International Security 28(1): 47-78.

Bapat, Navin A. 2005. Insurgency and the opening of peace processes. Journal of Peace Research 42(6): 699-717.

Enterline, Andrew J., and J. Michael Greig. 2008. Perfect storms? Political instability in imposed polities and the futures of Iraq andAfghanistan. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(6): 880-915.

Hegghammer, Thomas. 2006. Global jihadism after the Iraq war. Middle East Journal 60(1): 11-32.